After much collaboration, we have decided to name our documentary 'Life's Too Short' after one of Vanessa's original songs due to it's overall contribution during the film, and its powerful content.
The editing process for this film has been very rushed due to the deadline we are working on and so for the past few days we have been in the edit suites for 12 hours a day, however we have made huge progress and have completed the final cut just 3 days from starting. Although it isn't exactly how we would like the documentary to be, due to our circumstances and issues we've had, we are all very proud of it and hope others think it is an entertaining piece of film.
The Process
As soon as we came back from Liverpool on the Saturday, I began to get to work on capturing, transferring and sub clipping everything ready for my collaboration with Chris the following day on what we have, what we may need and if we can make a decent documentary in time for the deadline.
The Sound
Right from the off, we unfortunately had a big issue (as can be expected with our track record) as when transferring the sound off the marantz to a hard drive, I discovered that the whole interview had been recorded in mono but as an mp3 file. This meant the quality of the recordings was substandard and even very hard to understand at points, therefore unusable. To get around this issue I decided we would use the sound from the camera and use effects such as Dynamic Compressor to get the levels of the voice up whilst reducing the background noise as much as possible. The background noise was an issue and makes the whole film quite loud, but by putting in a generally louder than usual atmos, it becomes a lot less noticeable throughout.
Regarding the sound, I split up the whole of the interview to the individual answers and began using the compressor on them to get the levels up over that of all the different atmos tracks. Then, after the rough cut was done on final cut (which I will go into later) I began to put individual answers into corresponding sequences to the video and start a rough assembly with that. When the fine cut was done I rearranged certain answers, added more in and began putting in a mixture of atmos' and recordings from Vanessa's performances. I had to go a lot of key framing with the sound here as there are points where the answers stop and just the performance is wanted to be heard. Also I used various cut away's, L and J cuts in the fine edit which had to be mirrored by slowly fading in different atmos' and performances.
Overall, I am happy that the way the sound turned out based on the fact we only use the camera sound which was very cluttered and hard to hear at many points, however, if the marantz recordings would have worked, the whole soundtrack would be a lot easier to listen to, the atmosphere tracks would have been easier to distinguish and have more range to them, and we could have played around with a few more effects and programs to add mood through the use of set recordings along with foley sounds.
The Edit
Because of all the preliminary research and planning we did for this shoot, we had already strung together a general sequence for the film before we even set off for Liverpool, due to the structure of the questions, so building an assembly for this idea was very easy and took almost no time at all. I did however bring up points about potentially changing around certain questions due to the answers given to us by Vanessa, in note form, which I then passed on to Chris and we all reviewed them and agreed that some changes would have to be made. After applying these changes, we started off with a rough cut which took some time. In this we tried to carefully position establishing shots in between certain breaks in dialogue, sequences and even to make two adjoining questions link together, without to use of a jump cut. Even though this process took a while, we did have enough footage to fill out these spaces along with the clips of her performing and it made the whole film flow a bit smoother without any awkward pauses, jumping between shots or breaks in the timeline.
I also applied various effects to the footage in the final cut to make it more entertaining and pleasing to watch. The main thing I used was colour correction. This was big part of our project due to the weather and lighting we shot the majority of our footage in, as it was raining and quite overcast all day, the colour correction allowed is to increase certain parts of the exposure (mids/whites/darks) and also to increase the saturation and overall colour of the individual shots. Although this took time, it vastly increased the quality of the majority of our shots and also allowed is to create a clear and heavy mood by using desaturation on certain shots and bringing out their darks, to create a reflective and sober mood that I think worked quite well.
Finally, also due to the exposure on a few of our shots, I used the image shape and image mask effects in conjunction with feather image and by multi-layering certain partially underexposed shots and increasing the brightness (through colour correction) on those certain areas. This improved a lot of interview shots where the back drop was too bright compared to the subject in the centre of the frame which made the shot quite uncomfortable to view, but with these combine effects, we were able to improve them a lot.
All in all I am happy the way the project ultimately turned out, however there are many different things that we could have improved on, the post-production side of things when as well as they could have done and gave us a pleasing final product.








